Some Countries' Leaders Have Been Called Dictators, Terrorists for No Reasons

Simply because some leaders in some countries do not letting some other foreign countries get their best out of them, or letting foreigners do whatever they want in their countries, like they do to in Haiti and with the Haitian government (with the exceptional of Jean-Bertrand Aristide ) - Telling Haitian government what to do what to do, when to do it, give me that part of your land, sending criminals in Haiti, etc...


Because some other countries do not accept that kind of bias like Haitian government do, and willing to do what they think best for their own countries, so they have called them named such as 'dictators' and sometime 'terrorists'.

I have learned that, not only because it happened a lot lately in this era we living, but as well as in individual experience living. You see, there are so many tactics using against country, or against people in wars they do using some of those similar techniqes or tactics against individuals in country like in the U.S., for example. What I mean by that, when some people do not like been use or abuse, they know their rights and want to excess their rights legally, they do facing with those kind of threats too. Of course is not exactly, in the same way, the use of pretext to, labeling people with whatevever and do things to keep them in fear so they would be intimidated to protect their Human Rights, and etc...

So this what Lybia leaders are facing now. They said they going to bomb them in their own land and using the reason is for besetting their own people , but I believe in my opinion and also in most people in the world point of view that the true reason is for personal, personal interests and seem like it was a plan well played out.

There was a previous of what's going on now year ago when Scotland let free one man from Libya who was sentenced for life ( I did not know of him or what he did until the day the news was air lives on TV) and was let go due to a dying sickness where they believed he would die in few months, but did not. But country like the U.S. was not happy and tried anything to get the the poor sick man back to jail, but did not succeed and things were cool down for sometimes. Therefore, this is part of the reasons, and it is not only for that, but it's definitely not for the people. It is an obvious opportunity to manifest their longtime revenge, an opportunity to make out of their longtime hate against Libya government.

Rebel vs Government

Speaking of fighting for the people of Libya, whom they labeling as Rebels- so what country on earth that anyone knows, that people would just go out there on the streets with guns, knives, bombs in their hands to fight a government and the government would not be retaliated with all possible force therein to counter-against them?

In the U.S. I don't think any rebel groups would ever try protest against any president to step down, unless they know they ready to die, because they would be killed.

So, why telling a government of another country not to fight against rebels in their own country, whereas, you would do the same- Fight back, Kill those rebels until they cool down?